www.law4.org
  about

-warning-

This website tries to answer the question:
How to distribute political and economic power to all.

Proposed here is: a human scale direct and representative democratic Constitutional Republic with a human scale free market for products and services, outlawing Oligarchy, free land for all forever, and internally democratic larger businesses, while maintaining the freedom to start businesses and run them as desired. This is worked out in a full lenght Constitution, and a system of reforms and revolutions that goes from small local subsovereign activity, to larger efforts including changing existing law, to full scale Revolutions, to armed defense against murdering gangsters, to Revolutionary war of conquest against repression, to a distributed cell resistance inside a tyrannical system. ... read more ---->>

Method (html) | Goal 9 armed reform/revolution/constitution candelabrum system (left) and DAVID coat of tools seal (right)

[what is new]15 Dec 2014  

 

A better Society ?

DAVID/9-roads ...

Resulting from presented logical analyses and worked out in detail on this site, this below is the essence of the system. It should be understood as an extreme condensation in simple language of a fully worked out Constitution (from 239 articles plus supporting documentation to just 7):

The principles in these 7 laws come from 4 principles of economic power distribution (distribution of power in: Government, Companies/Businesses, Investment & Land). For ease of reading (laws tend to be difficult to read) it has also been worked out in the form of 50 laws, while the original Constitution made around these 4 principles is a 239 laws large Constitution (comparable in sized to the German Constitution for example, having a fair amount in common with modern Constitutions on the one hand, but having a somewhat altered economic system and a different way to achieve a Government for and by the people.). (Introduction.) Implementing these Constitutions in your nation is a separate subject, for which 9 roads have been engineered (see below). These 9 roads can lead into a new Government, who then can ratify these Constitutions starting from a 3 law one (only forming a Constitutional Assembly to negotiate the future Constitution for the nation whatever it should be), then above mentioned 7, then 50 and then 239 laws Constitution could be adopted (with any changes necessary, or other solutions alltogether). There are also extra-Constitutional recommendations that could be done. Everything else in the nation would remain the same, or is at least not targeted by this program directly.

 

 

Absolute democracy; rule by vote in post-startup, 10+ businesses,
free markets; all a part of the land; Constitutional Government;
socialized business credit; no empires; National sovereingty; Equality
under the law. Polities and Economies are not a candy store where
you can pick and choose. You will reap according to the laws that
you sowe.  

Constitution
revolution


*  free book (~441 pages, 2007): 'Constitution Proposal' This book explains you real economics (not capitalist or socialist extremism), and proposes a new Constitution for your nation with a hardcore true democratic Government (English). The main theme is: economic justice by spreading power.

*  free book (64 pages, 2011): 'Revolution & Reform - Manual & Law' This field-manual shows you the way how to change your nation through 9 modes of work of increasing strength. It is a short book containing the general plans, the second half contains the proposed Constitution. Please give to the masses if you can (English) ! The main theme is: protection against internal corruption.

*  free book (196 pages, 2014): 'D.A.V.I.D Constitution Ratification' This book contains the Constitution proposed here from its 1 law form, to 3 laws, 7 laws, 50 laws, 239 laws in 50 blocks with reasoning, and 239 laws with additional amendments. (The 239 laws with comments to each law is already contained in the 1st book.)

petitionpartyfundcorporateDemocracy-software

more... (addendum)

This is the site of Jos Boersema. I made all these things and give them to you for nothing, for the cause of Justice and Peace. Do not send me donations, thank you ;-), not necessary. Pay yourself with a better world to live in ?  

 

Translations list
English Nederlands Svenska Brasil

 

 

 

,,As we have seen, pretty well every revolution or attempted revolution in recent times has been overthrown, dissipated or corrupted into something unrecognizable from the aspirations of its founders. One reason for this is that as each revolution reached its peak, the people who made it were faced with a power vacuum. On such occasions, there where plenty of siren voices - come, let us elect a new Parliament, come, let us set up a new Parliament, come, let us unite behind God or Allah and seek his guidance - but very little organization for pushing forward to create out of the revolutionary ferment a new democracy tougher and more durable then the tragically weak and impotent democracies of the past.''
                                Paul Foot in The vote, how it was won and how it was undermined, page 445 2005  

 

 

Democratic Authorities Ventures Investments Demarcations: D.A.V.I.D.

 
 
           
 

  1 principle, 9 methods, 4 goals: 14 parts program ( summary 1 2 )
DAVID system:
                - (o-t) Principle: trade, own what you make.
                - (o-a) Goal: absolutely democratic government
                - (o-v) Goal: companies become democracies unless tiny/startups
                - (o-i) Goal: socialized/nationalized investment
                - (o-d) Goal: individually distributed natural resources (land)
9 roads system:
                - (o-0) Method: debating, (o-0B) single issue coalitions
                - (o-1) Method: buy fair trade.
                - (o-2) Method: organize progressive investment funds
                - (o-3) Method: organize progressive political parties
                - (o-4) Method: erect a new government, constructive revolution
                - (o-5) Method: military defense of free speech & free assembly
                - (o-6) Method: conquest of land for nationhood
                - (o-7) Method: distributed cell resistance against tyranny
                - (o-8) Method: keep the truth in existence
                                 youtubes on this

This system can also be represented in this form:

     The transformation of a dissatisfactory society ...
From open society:                From tyrannical society:
   --->               start              <---
(truth)    o-0(B)                   o-8      (protect truth)
(fair trade)  o-1               o-7         (cell resistance)
(businesses)     o-2         o-6            (army conquest)
(political)         o-3   o-5               (freedom armies)
                       o-4    (constructive revolution)
                       C-3    (Constitutional Assembly, 3 laws)
                       C-7    (Consolidated Constitution, 7 laws)
                       C-50   (Condensed Constitution, 50 laws)
                      C-239   (Constitution in 239 laws)
                      C-240+  (Constitution 240+ laws, partially DIY)
                       end. 
     The start of a DAVID system society ...

    
              
 

 

 
  Introduction/notices:     
 
 

* short system explanation  
* changes  
* help with backups.  

* Comment and discuss !!  

    
              

  Democratic Authorities Ventures Investments Demarcations

 

 

What is this system ?

The symbols and names of this system and science may set you on the wrong foot if you have any preconceptions. It can both be called socialist (for its nationalized finance and high end democracy), and liberal (for its free trade as the essential principle and its land-distribution, which is also communist/socialist); but you can also call it anti-socialist (for its free market and high end democracy (if you define socialist as dictatorship)), or be called anti-liberal (for its giving labor power and removing "elite" power abuses in the markets). In terms of existing ideological names the most fitting could be market socialism, with the emphasis on market. ... read more ---->>

[turning council]


Historical precedents

For the purpose of convincing the reader that a system like this is hardly folly, but has had strong ~ even grandiose ~ historical precedents, consider the following examples and historical proponants, going far back in time.

 

"England is not a free people, till the poor that have no land have a free allowance to dig and labour the commons..."
- Gerrard Winstanley, year 1649 CE  

 


The Torah

Although this website is not religious (it is rational and secular to the topics of economics and Government etc), it so happens that the law of Mozes of Israel has an intruiging economic system. It would be irrational to deny that fact. ... read more ---->>


Councils

"Originally proposed by the Menshevik wing of Russian socialism, the [Councils] met the spontaneous demands of workers for mass organization. Within three days it had assembled 226 delegates, chosen on th ebases of one delegate per 500 workers in the factories." ... read more ---->>
        - page 16, The Western Soviets ~ worker councils versus parliament 1915-1920, by Donny Gluckstein (Nov 1985).

 


The Mir village

See also the Russian Mir or Obshchina system of economics, or perhaps the most read yet ignored book in history: the Torah (laws of Mozes). On this site is also promoted that all should own their equal share of land, for life, for nothing, as an inalienable birthright in perpetuity. The system proposed here is different then other systems because those other systems where not known to undersigned at the time of writing. Land distribution is something different and practically opposite to common land ownership. In land-distribution you can work it together if you want to do so and for as long as you want to do so. Common land ownership and use quickly degenerates into tyranny, denying the individual liberty and probably soon fairness and income. Common land ownership is also unnecessarily stressful on common decision making. Land distribution (1), land ownership markets (2) and common land ownership/use (3) are three different systems of land rights (although combinations of these systems can be practiced). On this website there is always a common-land ownership aspect for infrastructure, parks, wild nature and so on, combined with land-distribution for designated and economically valuable land areas.


Native American Indian

"What is this you call property? It cannot be the earth, for the land is our mother, nourishing all her children, beasts, birds, fish and all men. The woods, the streams, everything on it belongs to everybody and is for the use of all. How can one man say it belongs only to him?" -Massasoit Superficially this may seem to be a contradiction with the Torah use of the word property, but it isn't a contradiction. The key is: the use of all. This land had previously been equally distributed by Jehoshua ben Nun, amongst the farming people that the Israelites where. This is about farm use of the land, for all.

White Rose

"Since the conquest of Poland, 300,000 Jews have been murdered in this country in the most bestial way... The German people slumber on in dull, stupid sleep and encourage the fascist criminals. Each wants to be exonerated of guilt, each one continues on his way with the most placid, calm conscience. But he cannot be exonerated; he is guilty, guilty, guilty!"

- 2nd leaflet of the White Rose.
~ In memory of Sophie Scholl

Now ~ when the children born during the lifetime of ❦ Sophie ❦ are still alive and well conscious of the world ~ fascist slaughtering is again being conducted on the European Continent in the Donbass region, by the western violent and fascist coup in the Ukraine. ... read more ---->>


To plan, or not to plan ?

Those who are generally known not to like planning, law and order, are the anarchists. Yet what did they learn according to their own publications, in Spain, quote: (Note: The apparently added square bracket [notes] "[feasible] solutions" and "resources [in terms of armaments]" are omitted from the quotation below, because it seems to reduce the power of what is being said. Emphasis "In the ... day comes." added. )

(...) Underpinning the NCDC's resolution of October 1934 was a determination to beef up the defense committees, overcoming their deficiencies, correcting mistakes, and above all, using the state's crackdown as a spur to carry on the struggle. The old tactics were dumped in favor of serious systematic revolutionary preparedness:

In the absence of preparation, there is no revolution -- and the more intense and shrewder the preparations, the more the revolution will prosper when the day comes. We must end the weakness for improvization and hot-headed schemes as the only solutions in difficult times. That mistake, of trusting to the creative instincts of the masses, has cost us very dearly. One cannot just conjure up, as if through spontaneous generation, the necessary means to fight a war against a state that boasts experience, vast resources, and superior offensive and defensive capabilities.
(...)


From: Ready for Revolution, quoting the NCDC, page 15-16.

From the glossery at page 2: "NCDC - National committee of Defense Committees". Title: READY FOR REVOLUTION ~ THE CNT DEFENSE COMMITTEES IN BARCELONA 1933-38, by: Agustin Guillamon, translated: Paul Sharkey Publisher AK Press (2014). Just about as radical anarchist a publishing house as one can find, with the anarchist flag as the logo ?

Where is this Revolutionary planning, in (to undersigned knowledge) the most detailed form (perhaps ever) ? Where is it the most shrewd, not taking any chances with internal corruption, violence, or underestimating the power of peaceful activities such as organizing and simply arguing for what is reasonable ? You are looking at it.. While the famous proponent of Capitalism may be Adam Smidth (who certainly made some good points), and the famous proponent of Communism was Karl Marx (who likewise did), their main works (The Wealth of Nations and Das Kapital, respectively) do not contain extensive planning or detailed ideological development. Did Smidth win, because even the sketchy outline he wrote about a new society (to replace the Feudal system?) was more then Marx had said when he merely criticized the Capitalist order without planning for a replacement or improvement ?

Perhaps an interesting thought might be that the system presented here (D.A.V.I.D.) is more extensive and more integrated within itself, then is Capitalism. This D.A.V.I.D. system is ideologically more worked out than purely hypothetical Capitalism, and also than practically existing Capitalism. Practically existing capitalism is on its core issues (where it would differ from this D.A.V.I.D. model) a simplistic model. Naturally there are masses of laws about endless topics, but that is not at odds with this here presented model ~ on the contrary. Capitalism is also getting more simplistic sometimes by way of deregulation, as is happening at the time of this writing.

Will through the rigor of time, the hardest ideological substance be the last one to remain ? In a tumbler full of large rocks, the one diamond may at first be difficult to find. After enough tumbling around, all the other rocks could turn to dust and blow away on the wind. Only the diamond would possibly remain. One could then ask the reasonable question: is this model hard, or is it a mishmash of various inputs that are held together by the mere taste of the author, such as is the case in the capitalist-welfare State (a loose combination of capitalist and social-activist measures) ? Fact of the matter is that this system here all flows from a single ideological point, to wit: power distribution to all. The whole model is strongly integrated with itself. It does not need capitalism, it does not need anarchy, and it does not need socialism or communism. It has already what is good about them, without drawing on them. Knowing this system currently like no other, I can honestly say that it is tough as rocks, and (to my knowledge) the strongest and probably most durable ideological system known in the western world, worked out in an amount of detail that previous revolutions probably have not even managed to do a tenth of the amount of preparations, including the revolution of the current model (Capitalism) against the preceding one (Feudalism).

What will such self boasting and repulsive arrogance bring us ? By having good confidence in the system, it protects us from acting rashly, as we would put our confidence in time and experience to show the ultimate truth. We do not have to convince anyone necessarily, we only have to try to live it for ourselves. If it works and it is better, it will work and it will spread. If not, it will end on the compost heap of history, where in that case it will belong.


 

Here some links to parties/groups who seem to have some commonality with the goals here, to show that these ideas are not weird nor are they unique to this site: ./others.html

 

The revolution is made with the software of: Powered by Debian / GNU / Linux

DAVID/9-roads .... because sloganocracy does not work.

disclaimer