Introduction to a D.A.V.I.D. system (1)

[Q5, o-a]

  ^ A multi-shot video with some static graphics, about how the Constitutional flag protocol works, as the first part of a general introduction to a D.A.V.I.D. system and the revolutionary schemes (grand cursory introduction to it all).

Outline of a voter-group Democracy.

[Q6, o-a]

  ^ A crude video of a new system of representation in the State for the people (general public). You might want to see that and more schematics here: http://www.law4.org/post/002/086-gov-... And the exact laws here: http://www.law4.org/law Thank you for your interest. This can be your nation ! These proposals where not boiled out on a few dark evenings, but have been manufactured over the course of more then a year (if not several years). I'll do more videos later, and dress up really sharp, too ... (lol). Despite how amuzing this might be (?), it is deadly serious. You leaving your representative to do whatever the heck they like, is equally deadly ... serieus.

(1/11) Economics

[Q6, o-tavid]

View here for automatically starting next part,
click on the first part there.

  ^ (1/11)

(2/11) Economics

[Q6, o-tavid]

  ^ (2/11)

(3/11) Economics

[Q6, o-tavid2]

  ^ (3/11)

(4/11) Economics

[Q6, o-tavid]

  ^ (4/11)

(5/11) Economics

[Q6, o-tavid]

  ^ (5/11)

(6/11) Economics

[Q6, o-tavid]

  ^ (6/11)

(7/11) Economics

[Q6, o-tavid]

  ^ (7/11)

(8/11) Economics

[Q6, o-tavid]

  ^ (8/11)

(9/11) Economics

[Q6, o-tavid]

  ^ (9/11)

(10/11) Economics

[Q6, o-tavid]

  ^ (10/11)

(11/11) Economics

[Q6, o-tavid]

  ^ (11/11) Real economics, not damaged by the forces who get rich off of bad economic practices. It is impossible to do logical economics without starting a revolution.

Tribute to fair trade

[Q6, o-1]

  ^ Nothing is said in this video, because what needs to be said ? Just making the video series complete with all schemes.

Mechanics of scheme 2

[Q6, o-2]

  ^ System to provide credit to businesses without the credit system rearing up tyrannical businesses and tyrannical nations and tyrannical empires and a total world wide domination empire. These effects are all a matter of high school logic, simple enough.

Capturing the state by the people

[Q3, o-3]

  ^

Sudden mass Revolution

[Q6, o-4]

  ^ Short description of how a sudden outburst of revolution would work under this system. See also http://www.law4.org/sheet2.txt http://www.law4.org/sheet3.txt http://www.law4.org/sheet4.txt http://www.law4.org/sheet5.txt

Important to realize that when this new system is being done it does not automatically claim the sovereingty. Even if it does become the majority it still does not automatically claim the sovereingty. Such decisions have to be taken rationally and strategically then. There happens to be a suitible body to decide what the claim of the new system is going to be: the national real-or-pseudo Government set up by this effort. If no claim of sovereingty is made, it is still left standing and maintained as a means of training it, establishing it further, to decide in the future to achieve sovereingty; it could either grow or shrink depending on its popularity.

This is part 1, probably make some more about how it approaches sovereingty and how a 'slow burn' revolution works too, and how a slow burn revolution interacts with a sudden revolution.

(1/2) Revolution

[Q6, o-4]

View here for automatically starting next part,
click on the first part there.

  ^ (1/2)

(2/2) Revolution [o-4]

[Q6, o-4]

  ^ Revolu!ion (scheme 4), what the general public would need to do during a sudden revolutionary effort, what a slow revolutionary effort is, and how the Sovereingty is being handled.

Unfortunately what is drawn on the whiteboard is not exactly clear, but it doesn't matter too much (?). Probably due to artificial light being used.

Realistic revolution

[Q6, o-4 (o-4, o-3, o-2, o-5: interactions]

  ^ How a realistic revolution would unfold under this system, where the many schemes would happen together in a variety of ways to complement each other.

Official Revolution.

[Q6, o-a]

  ^ The official criteria to be met when engaging in this revolution.

Symbols of the Revolution

[Q6, o-4] -->

  ^ Symbols to be used when needed.

(1/2) Council/ positions Symbols (comp)

[Q6, o-4]

View here for automatically starting next part,
click on the first part there.

  ^ (1/2)

(2/2) Council/ positions Symbols (comp)

[Q6, o-4]

  ^ (2/2) Symbols for delegates and councils for use by article 3.1.d Government.

Military uprising to defend freedom of speech and political assembly

[Q6, o-5]

View here for automatically starting next part,
click on the first part there.

  ^ (1/2).

part 2

[Q6, o-5]

  ^ Crude video (2/2). Outline of armed peoples' uprising to defeat tyranny and restore the absolute minimum of decency for a democracy: freedom of speech & political assembly. http://www.law4.org/post/004/phalanx/phalanx.html

(1/3) Proper military uprising

[Q6, o-5]

View here for automatically starting next part,
click on the first part there.

  ^ (1/3).

(2/3) Proper military uprising

[Q6, o-5]

  ^ (2/3).

(3/3) Proper military uprising

[Q6, o-5]

  ^ Crude video (3/3). Explaining briefly why this military type resistance is not violence but prevents violence, prevents a badly organized and ill conceived strategy for an armed resistance against an open tyranny from happening by replacing that with somethnig that is professional, deliberate, highly structured, transparent, simple, honorable and non-political.

Because of this system, the force is being applied only to the degree necessary to establish the freedoms to split out into political differences again, and to debate and vote about all the content in a peaceful way.

Also gives a short overview of the 9 roads of revolution that are this system, of which this military system is only 1 road.

(If you didn't understand a word sounding like "Ghandi," that is it, Mahatma Ghandi, the non-violent way that worked against the Brittish Empire - in my opinion that worked because the Brittish falsely believed their Empire was an honorable one, but Ghandi proved them wrong. This does only work like that if the opression depends on the support of such misguided people... right ? Taking a serious beating before fighting back is always an excellent idea to show that we are the side of honor, but it is not necessarily enough in the end.)

http://www.law4.org/post/004/phalanx/phalanx.html

Training video (1/2)

[Q6, o-5]

  ^ (1/2)

Training video (2/2)

[Q6, o-5]

  ^ Training under this system involves primarily self training and training by relatively small groups for the most part (say up to soldier-group/Sergeant sizes). Sometimes more such groups could combine into Companies, Battallions and Regiments to allow more extended real-world training (supplies, infrastructure, communication, and even play-war and maneuvres) for the Captains, Majors and Colonels, and the soldiers and subofficers for integration into larger units.

Once things are well understood that way, there is a good chance things will go well. For the Generals it is most likely relevant to study military history and theory, and the Generals have to be relatively intelligent people by themselves, and have a creativity and unpredictability for the enemy.

The training should also include experiencing the internal democratic system, for such purpose it might be useful to occaisionally combine into Divisions, which could set up such Divisions in a latent way (as a potential).

The training should primarily be done by soldiers and small groups themselves, as a way to keep their humanity intact and expand it. That gives them self-confidence and the strength, will and ability to stand up against their Officers if that is necessary.

Keep on switching the Sergeant, Corporal roles around quite a bit, so that the soldiers all have some experience with that too. The ones who really can't do it that will become evident then, but still they can learn a lot that way, things don't need to go perfect. The same may not be true for Lieutenants and higher, we need a skilled officer and generals class in my opinion. Strength (soldiers) and immediate 'soldiers tactics' is one half of the battle, the other half is intelligence, how to impart that strength, organize it and maintain it. For that reason all the Officers Lieutenant and higher (the lieutenants will then better understand the higher officers) should invest.

Note: the point that soldiers train themselves primarily was not yet part of the documentation in this system (iirc), but it is now ( http://www.law4.org/post/004/phalanx/... ).

See also http://www.law4.org/post/004/phalanx

IMPORTANT NOTICE: if you wish to engage in these systems, it may be better if you did not inform me. I am nothing, I don't matter, I don't need to know. The second I know, anyone along the communication line also knows. DO NOT SEND ME ENCRYPTED MESSAGES EITHER. Maintain maximum strategic and tactical advantage, and do not compromise your goals and methods for useless side issues. Good luck.

I know how all this may sound cartoonesque or funny, or something out of a Jame Bond movie. But the reality of tyranny is no laughing matter, and what I am proposing here is not meant as a laughing matter either, it is meant to win without becoming itself the source of the problem. Secondly, in each movie/film there where of course some elements of truth embedded therein. That was fiction, this is reality. Let's hope that we don't need to actually fight, a goal that is all the nearer if our enemies know they would loose such a fight because of our superior organization, goals, will and masses.

part 1

[Q6, o-345]

View here for automatically starting next part,
click on the first part there.

  ^ (1/3)

part 2

[Q6, o-345]

  ^ (2/3)

part 3

[Q6, o-345]

  ^ (3/3) Some general collection of the major strategies in this system.

Outline of dividing a council in subcouncils.

[Q6, o-a]

  ^ A crude video explaining without detail how a 50 person state council (part of the http://www.law4.org/law Government system) can work by having it divided into 5 sub-councils, without explaining the reasons why either.

Outline of a step by step system for decision making.

[Q6, o-a]

View here for automatically starting next part,
click on the first part there.

  ^ (1/3).

part 2

[Q6, o-a]

  ^ (2/3).

part 3

[Q6, o-a]

  ^ Crude video (2/3). A 9 step decision making process: creative (1), research (2), sharing knowledge (3), defining positions relative to each other (4), are we still a group (5), conflict management (6), consensus (7), working out details (8), satisfaction (or not?) (9). See also http://www.law4.org/post/004/govern

Notices

Because video is too large to easily store on a website like mine (especially if it becomes more), these videos are uploaded to http://www.youtube.com/user/wwwjhwhbe, and then only presented here as an embedded element. If these videos where to be lost there somehow, then this page could perhaps source them from another place relatively easily (making this a potentially more stable page to find these videos).