|
|
DAVID-WE
|
Torah of Moshe Rabbeinu
|
Karl Marxists (Communist: Marxist)
|
social democrats / mid left
|
Adam Smithists / right (bourgeoisie)
|
|
companies worker owned
|
yes *1
|
... *1
|
yes *1
|
(yes(/no)) *1
|
yes/no *1
|
|
free-trade in products/services
|
yes
|
yes
|
no
|
(yes)
|
yes *2
|
|
free-trade in capital
|
no *2
|
no *2
|
no
|
((no/)yes) *2
|
yes *3
|
|
free-trade in land/resources
|
no *3
|
no *3
|
no *2
|
(((yes)))
|
yes
|
|
Detailed laws:
|
yes
|
yes
|
no
|
(no)
|
no
|
|
Simplification of economic model
|
trade effort, distribute power
|
trade effort, not power
|
democratic power,
no trade
|
|
trade everything, but disperse monopolies
|
|
|
*1 When starter leaves and larger then 10, or started as democracy
(companies in a free-trade system, not like Marxism.)
|
*1 No official position for or against, but slaves freed, laws passed to
increase power of slaves, laws against slavery (3500 years ago).
|
*1 Companies would become part of national plan-economy, no free trade.
|
*1 The mid-left generally have no fundamental ideas about economic structure,
they tend to be a tactical platforms to achieve immediate and therefore
short-term improvements. Hence parenthesized to identify the lack of position.
|
*1 In practice: no. A worker-owned company is not a great threat, can be
sunk using capital investments when needed.
|
|
|
*2 Only when a socially useful side-effect occurs, for profit speculation
prohibited.
|
*2 Do not lend on interest (for profit), lend readily.
|
*2 Collectives, part of nationalized plan-economy (direct state democratic
control of everything).
|
*2 Favored nationalization like Marxists and DAVID once, now seem
to have lost that one bit of fundamental theory that they had.
|
|
|
|
*3 Ongoing distribution system (see chapter 9).
|
*3 Dividing the land by lottery, ownership reverts in the 50th
year, only selling permamently in cities: looks like land
distribution.
|
|
|
*3 Unless banks threaten to go bankrupt and are part of the club, then they
can get a subsidy.
|