I am now against everything I said. I am now against everything I said. Jos Boersema. posted on Monday, January 12, 2009 3:46 PM Comments # re: I am now against everything I said. Jos Boersema Does that make ANY difference whatsoever ? No ! But if that thought makes an impact on what you believe, then you are suffering from subjugation to "authority argument." Isn`t my stuff argued for in complete detail ? Did I provide any argument whatsoever that I am now "against" my previous statements ? No i didn`t, so that means the above statement is meaningless and should not impact your "belief" in my statements, which should be flowing from your agreement with arguments. At best you might now be looking to see upcoming arguments, but there aren`t going to be any, because of course I still believe in whatever I said before in relation to what this website(s) are about. Also trying to desensitise you to possible future back-tracking by proponents or false proponents of my stuff, including potential violent abuse. The arguments are what counts, not who says them. I still believe everything I said. Posted @ 1/12/2009 3:51 PM # re: I am now against everything I said. Jos Boersema You don`t need me with my stuff. You don`t need me with my stuff. You don`t need me with my stuff. You don`t need me with my stuff. Don`t get demoralized if I`m killed. It shouldn`t matter one bit. Everything is written down already with me being killed in mind. Killing "the leader" is one of the first contra stragegies of the enemy. In this case it will do them no good. In fact it could harm them, as revenge might not just remove them from power according to my strategy (written down and distributed already). If I`m killed, the enemy is most likely in the establishment. Probably with international connections, as the Dutch establishment isn`t very violent (at home). They might kill me merely to demoralize you, "to set an example" and so on and so forth. So don`t be demoralized by something like that, but work 10 times harder on the needed changes to make them pay for it. The best way to make them pay for something like political murders, is to see true political change happen sooner. I`ll take that as useful revenge, thanks. The fact that most people don`t understand my stuff yet doesn`t mean you need me with it. It is easily well explained enough that smart people are able to teach it to most people, and don`t forget that I have not much luck explaining my own stuff to you either (because most people care too little, or honestly aren`t smart enough for some reason.) Do not be demoralized if they kill (my body) ! They can`t kill the ideas with a bullet. If they kill me, that shows you how afraid and childish they are, how vulnerable that they need to kill their opponent, rather then fight it out in words and with votes. Scared little shit rats, that`s what they are. Go put them out of business forever. They can kill me, but they can`t kill the truth. They can only underline the truth. Your job to take notice of the truth and put the liars out of business. DO IT! All the way ! Yes we can win, and yes we will win ! I`ll be back in my next life to see how you did ! So no matter, just go fix things. They can`t kill the truth, and murder only highlights it. You don`t need me with my stuff. You don`t need me with my stuff. You don`t. Nothing is lost if I die, nothing they could destroy because all is already said. All they might do is silence me. Which in fact might end up helpfull, because that way you are forced to do more by yourselves without any centralized advisory of any kind (which I would obviously be since it is my stuff after all, and although rational I do understand it quite well since I wrote it.) If I`m murdered simply say: aha! now we have an excuse to work harder, great ! Posted @ 1/12/2009 7:06 PM # re: I am now against everything I said. Jos Boersema http://www.socialism.nl/archives/ALL-IN-ONE.tar Much much more then you`d ever need, multi threaded, highly flexible / adaptible strategies & end goals. The enemy has no answer to this, except being defeated, first in theory and principle, then in public support, and finally on the ground, never being able to return to power because it really will work and remain stable forever. Don`t fear the enemy, don`t fear death, only fear ignorance. Don`t fear power or responcibility, just make the most of it according to your ability, nothing more could be demanded of anyone. Go for it, go for it, go for it, go for it. Posted @ 1/12/2009 7:25 PM # re: I am now against everything I said. Jos Boersema (Give me a minute to set permissions right, sorry.) Posted @ 1/12/2009 7:28 PM Post Comment - - - - PS If I`m captured and asked to say to disagree with my statements, even to make up arguments against my own work: I will have no problem with making such statements or arguments, even if I probably don't agree with them. Reason is simple: arguments are neutral as such, conclusions based on them also, and my personal opinion without arguments is irrelevant. Your job one way or the other is to find out what arguments are right and what are wrong. It can be a good excersize on you to hear bad arguments believing they come from someone you trust, or hearing good arguments believing they come from someone you don't trust. Only if you manage through such distractions can you really be rational & therefore capable of operating real democracy. If you can't hear correct arguments from someone you distrust and hate, who belongs to clubs you hate and distrust, wears symbols you associate with all things bad, you are not ready for democracy. It can also happen that my site gets attacked, blatantly, or by replacing it with something that appears to be from me. The text can also be damaged, causing distrust. All these things should not matter ultimately, but if they do it is unlikely to come from me. The stuff is locked into these signed archives: if they get changed that is a signal something is potentially wrong and not coming from me. The only thing I can still change is add to these additional messages here, and a few files not in the archives (quick-id). Note that for some actors it will be possible to break into my pgp/gpg key. But it will not be possible as easily to erase all existing distributed copies. "Only logic and science cross borders," there is no world leadership organization in the system proposed here, and no world Justice system. That means every border becomes a filter, it would filter out untruth and let through the truth, which can lead to action only if that is the will of its sovereign people. I note that because it will be unlikely that this system will collapse and that a horrible one world state emerges, that to experience the - what I'd call mistake of the - one world state, we would need to do that now. Then on its ashes we could build a better world, if that is still possible. In a way we are already there more or less, even formally with "a world court," "a federated UN government," "a world army (UN)", a "world bank," etc. Sat Jan 17 10:48:06 UTC 2009