Council made per village/town/city
 ----------------------------------

Given all the previous writing on councils, it is easy enough to
adapt a voter-group, (optional 1) 1st order council, (optional 2)
delegate section and 2nd order council to any size and circumstance.
For example to change the system so that each village and town
will decide by themselves how they will set up their council system(s).
Maybe one city wants to use many councils and one overseeing council,
while another only wants lower councils and yet another only a centralized.
Another may want exactly so many per voter group, council, section and
2nd order council(s), as fits snugly into their number of people.

This can be done on the provincial level also: every wider area deciding
how they want their council to work.

If such an idea is not widely carried in a nation (a nation?), then
one could divide the nation into sectors of 50, so that they at least
send in one representative to form a national Government. At least
under the proposed Constitution the law would have to be adapted so
as to allow these councils in any shape and form yet still be recognized
as the public Government (under the Constitution.) This way each province
(1/50th) can do what they think best, while having a public interface
with the rest of the nation that the rest of the nation can properly
work with (although if differences become extreme, so extreme they can
no longer (reasonably?) be part of the same Constitution, either one
would divide into several nations or have to change other parts of the
Constitution (the part saying the Constitution is one across the nation).

Obviously, I suppose, one could organize councils in any way one wanted
anyway, while forming constitutional councils also, who then simply
constantly stamp for approval what these councils say (but that may be
tedious, though can be a temporary solution, and a trial).

It is one of the quirks of the proposed Constitution that its 1st order
Government councils bear no direct relationship to villages and towns,
and are only on a larger size properly set on one village and town
(from 50 * 50, 2500 onward). For today its villages/cities that is often
adequate because they are larger. (It was suggested previously that
very small villages could be ruled by detachments of councils as a 
ministry-council, who themselves could be structured as voted councils
in their own right, which should be Constitutional too.)

When it is desired that for example there is only one central council
in one village or city and no others of any kind, then at least if that
is widely believed then the 1st order delegates would simply refrain
from organizing 1st order councils, which would require a slight change
in the Constitution (because the proposal says that the delegates will
form 1st order councils, with 2nd order councils being optional.)
But having formed these 1st order councils, they could still decide
to rarely if ever use them, leaving most/all decisions to a central
village or town council (in which all the delegates are represented
also, or could be).

It is also possible per the 'departments' ('ministeries' in Dutch)
rule (3.1.d.6) that another political structure descends down from
the nation Government, the provincial Government, or other Constitutional
councils, especially if that is not resisted and/or conflicting with
the competence of these smaller-group councils (and/or not contested
in court, and/or if the law is changed to allow for it, and/or if
the Courts decide it is good (which certainly during national
disintegration there is more argument to support a stricter top down
element because "stability has become a national/provincial/city wide
concern, therefore such/such council is competent to address the issue
sufficiently, even when crossing the will of smaller area councils"
(see: 3.4 Space)

See also:
         http://www.socialism.nl/post/003/2010-05-06_DA---_--_en
                (Centralized Democracy)