. . Subject: Re: Libertarian Socialists Form in Denmark . . . . . . . > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... Heard of local Government, or division into nations... If person A wants to do something in way B, and person C wants to do it in way D and person E in way F, and person G in way H, then you can bet your behind that there are more like A, C, E and G. If it is important enough for them: they find each other in an area, and do stuff their way. Maybe B is living in a large extended production village ? Go ahead ! Have fun ! So they take a territory north, say. Maybe ... you get the picture. If the differences are even more fundamental, often they are not but they can: divide into different nations. Each of these nations can do things completely different. Maybe D was having a Grandiose Leader at the helm ? Let them do that then, as long as the rest can get (the hell!) out of that nation (and man the borders !). If you have extremely low population density, you can have the system of sovereign local Government. Murderers will tend to form gangs, occaisionally you may need to launch wars on such misbehaving local areas (crime dens). It works, the NDNs did it this way, or some did. If you have high population density this may not work well, but you can still allow for high differences between local areas, and of course different nations. My system http://www.socialism.nl says that if local Governments deal with local problems, national Government with national, the larger area Governments can not dismiss the smaller area Governments, and if a disagreement between two local Governments can not be resolved in two different ways (one for each), then the national Government must decide how it is to be resolved. That should allow for important regional differences. Please *DO* note that we're talking abuot reality and so the method of thinking you should use is not analytical or abstract: it is simulations. Simulate it in your mind, what will happen. What would the differences actually be ? You'll find that while in the abstract the weirdest dichotomies are possible, in actual fact things are far less problematic. You think one persons wants oil from the tap, while another water ? In theory, it can happen, in practice it never will, etc. Please think about reality, simulate it. You honestly think any sane person wants to live under a vicious absolute dictatorship ? Nearly nobody does, nobody does. Just not a realistic problem. Think about reality. These people who have set in in their minds that governent must by definition be evil or 'force' ? Babies. They don't think about reality. Ask them whether they think in their ideal world there would ever be a coming together of people to decide on a common issue. The answer will be yes. So, that's where their entire way of thinking falls flat on its behind. Such a useles garbage this leftwing thinking, and in the mean time the world goes to pieces. What was that famous word on evil winning ? It happens if good people do nothing. Trash thinking counts as doing nothing. -- http://www.socialism.nl