.
.
Subject: Re: WSWS asks: who will provide revolutionary 'leadership' against war/crisis ?
.
.
.
.
.
.


 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
[...]

For the record i'm not trying to challenge the existing work of
WSWS, only their position / program on social changes, in the interest
of debate and progress, so that the best program for change would end
up followed by more people.

The WSWS could end up being an asset for coming social changes, one
way or the other.

*

An amuzing sidenote is maybe that at least my program is against
national unity parties, and even more so international unity parties.
They are an international unity party; they follow a different
program. Maybe both programs can even complement each other, provided
corruption doesn't take over (which is the worry in my system with
great unity organizations, even nationally but worse internationally).
I didn't say they are corrupt, just that the danger seems higher
with the greater unity.