.
.
Subject: Al Martin predicts 'classic' overproduction/under-wage crisis ?
.
.
.
.
.

Al Martin predicts/exposes 'classic' overproduction/under-wage crisis ?

Conspiracy Planet - Al Martin - Global Economics: The 'Shadow'
Inventory Problem
http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?ChannelID=49

Nice brain cracker for us, dufuses. But having read it I come to the
reasonable conclusion: the economy had been badly structured perhaps
by too cheap credit setting the world up for a big slashing of all
bad economic initiatives, the banks saw it coming and cooked the books:
stashing bad debt into operations they wanted to shove the Treasuries
down the old hole (up behind); the Americans where already severely
underpayed for long and therefore encouraged to lend themselves (into
slavery) which was a disaster in the making too; nicely on schedule
too was the Government debt game that was about to disintegrate (it is a
pyramid game after all, if you explode the debt it falls apart at some
point); the fuse was lit by having ordinary Americans overleverage 
themselves badly with mortgages; the fuse went off with a media
spectacle ('the housing crisis') causing a big scare and therefore cover
for other problems (if any) so the scapegoat problem was done ('just
some stupid mortgages, nothing wrong with the overall design of the
capitalist system or the gov debt game which is really a tax evasion
scheme for the rich); then the economic restructuring (another regular
business cycle downturn, resession) could be made worse by the
overreacting media causing scare in the consumers starting them to save
money rather then spend (trying to make the business cycle worse, so the
big players can buy more stuff cheaper); the Governments then moved in
to save the corporations that where falling to save jobs for the moment,
and in the generalized panic they managed to get banks stuffed with bad
instruments shoved unto the tax-payer and simply take in a gigantic
amount of free cash for nothing (the banker bailout), and there is a
nice congruency here between the jobs temporarily saved with artificial
measures (such as in Holland: the gov payes income of certain
'essential labor' (!!!!!) how truly weird indeed, and not a good idea
imho) so there is clearly not as much outrage to the bank bailout as
there should have been (for such a scandalous measure); but now we're
still sitting on an economy which is having to have its bad initiative
slashed badly (which is an artificial cycle generated by the banking
industry through central bank loan rates, a cycle that acts like a great
pump to those who control / know it, they can constantly bust
adversaries and buy up good corps on the bottom of a resession
concentrating wealth / power until they control everything of value ..
in the entire world really, at least that is a natural goal); so this
restructuring is now going ahead anyway and the consumers are still
scared, which seems it is like something you can't avoid with Government
money anyway, unless you want to end up ith a plan-economy (!) but that
will be a catastrophe in its own right does /not/ avoid the
restructuring needed either (what doesn't sell, doesn't sell, shouldn't
be produced, but in a badly structured economy (from cheap credit
initiatives and no organic adaptation of supply/demand) it is produced
anyway); so tick tock tick tock on that; and then going into the future
.......... the Government debt game starts to destabilize; whole nations
can be snapped up now through IMF controls (which buys power rather then
money ... but power is money too, the banks are no longer merely picking
up entire conglomerates on the bottom of a business cycle, they're now
picking up entire nations); through the IMF they demand whole nations
throw their *public* sector on the open market which is really throwing
it into the arms of the waiting banks; ...

Damn, that makes a lot of sense to me. hah.

... and then there are endless possibilities to restructure the world
and nations. You could ... do so many things, I wouldn't dare to
speculate lest giving them ideas. It won't be good, though, imho.

Did that make sense to you too ? It also matches what Al, the good
kolonel (touch that dude, and you'll pay a price, we'll organize a
manhunt from the North to South pole to find the guilty ones), said
about 'them' wanting now to usurp all the public wealth (/again/, this
is an old game you know, trying to eat the public interest; we of course
fought for that public sector to come into being, and now they attempt
to destroy it again.)
-- 
http://www.socialism.nl (The above is *not* a run course, it is *not*
a necessity that it goes that way, on the CONTRARY, it is the reason to
break away from this whole bank control over theworld, and go for
democracy by the people, for the people. Seriously. We can win, but you
got to think big, imho, it is a /big/ problem and 'they' have serious
power, including the power to wage war on entire continents; that's
nothing to get scared for though, rather all the more reasons to get on
it asap.)