. . Subject: Re: mobilizing for revolutionary war . . . . . . And you think the enemy in this ideological/political war will do what exactly, sit buy and applaude the winner ? I did approach this as a political peaceful struggle for years, but nothing was done (not by you either to be honest) that was necessary and easily possible using the given political rights. If nothing sufficient is done with the fought for rights/freedoms, then most likely the enemy will first destroy these rights before the people are going to do anything. The people don't want to move forward and they don't care enough about moving backwards, so they will move backwards first. With these rights destroyed they will have to be recaptured first, which is exactly the whole goal of an armed uprising: to secure again political rights. After that is secured there is again the space to have a 'brain war.' You don't seem to appreciate the power of the enemy, this is a very dangerous mistake. If you don't appreciate the possibility of armed repression you are living in the fantasy world that the TV has created for the masses. I don't don't want an armed uprising just because, but it is sometimes necessary. How do you think you have gotten the right of free speech and political assembly, for example ? You think the tyrants not too long ago, a few generations, just handed that to the people because it seemed like a good idea ? Take for example Iraq, what choice do these people have at the moment, being faced with a criminal opression ? Sit it out while the people die by the hundreds of thousands every year ?! That is never going to end then, crime can pay if it is not prosecuted, it won't be unless the Government is in the service to the public and under its complete control (democracy.) When the time for armed uprising comes, if ever, you will know why it is necessary. It happens exactly *because* you do not put on your website either what is necessary to be done, have you ? No you haven't, you didn't attempt to explain why free trade in money is bad, or why companies should be democracies and the state an absolute democracy, or why empires never can work. Maybe this is not your goal with your site, or what you want to specialize in, all fine with me of course. But meanwhile the 'brain war' is being lost one way or the other. This is the complete political and ideological failure that may very well degenerate in another world war. Please don't blame me for making up a scheme for armed uprising that at least we have a better chance of winning it once it comes, that's all I did, and that this armed uprising doesn't itself become the main problem (because war tends to breed tyranny.) Once the need for people's self defense comes, it can be done wrong or right, if it is done wrong we may end up with a half criminal 'officer corps,' where is that going to lead ? Nowhere good I think. We are all on the same side here, it is a brain war until now, but please then WIN IT ! I'm not winning it either, but not for lack of trying imho. This is a lot bigger then a few conspiracy plots or the killing of the Polish political elite, or this entire crisis, or even everything that happened since 1945. These is the great struggle that started after the feudal order collapsed, against capitalism which too over after the feudal system but that was itself also not too great, the system. It is about law: what law governs the nations. Essentially that will probably always remain a brain-war, because ultimately it is up to the people to understand these things and make a good life for themselves. I'm trying to reason with you now as well, which is part of this brain war that the truth (as i see it) is currently not winning. WW3 seems to become inevitable, same scheme as around 1929, which was extremely profitable for a select set of capitalist enterprises, and it burned down any chance of the public winning big political improvements using the vote and other forms of struggle. Why do you think WW1 happened ? Because the people where nearing a victory over capitalism, hence the capitalists reacted with a big war when they could. Why could they ? Because the people didn't get their stuff right, the opposition was deeply divided and they where actually *all* wrong (the communists, the socialists and the anarchists and the liberals all had inferior ideas). Thus defeated in the brain war, the war was started to burn them up, and that is what happened. It is 1900 once more, if the brain war - the war for objective truth and social laws that work - is not won, more world wars are likely. It is not one nation against the other, but both ruling classes want their serfs to kill each other on the battle field to maintain control. It may end up necessary for an armed people's uprising to crush their own internal ruling class tyranny if it happens, and perhaps to defend their nation from imperial capitalist armies. But just like in 1917, we need a global revolution to prevent self-liberated nations who form a progressive example to other nations who are still suffering under capitalism or some bad system, to be attacked by an overwhelming coalition of deluded imperial troops. War isn't going to way by pretending it isn't there, and armed resistance is going to be necessary because people like to think everything is well while it is not. If only people put the blinders off for a moment and think real hard to understand the truth about economics and Constitutions, law, then this could be won easily in the best way possible: peaceful political uprising and economic activity. But don't delude yourselve that it is going to happen like that, because where is it ? Sorry for making this too long, tried to shorten it but it only kept growing. -- http://www.socialism.nl