.
.
Subject: Re: Anyone having 100.000.000 AK-47s to spare ?
.
.
.
.
.
.


[...]
 > ...
 > ...
 > ...
[...]

It is best that weapons building is as distributed as possible.
Every city or larger village having its own arms production, machine
guns and what they want, because that distributes power and prevents
an easy enemy attack on a weapons manufacturing plant. It is also
easier to hide smaller weapons factories, and to destroy / relocate
them if the enemy is nearing. For this purpose one would probably want
a simple gun that is still effective, and that probably is still the
AK-47 as a basic weapon (reliable and simple). Using the same basic
weapon all over means the bullets and guns are interchangeable accross
all armies, because troops are likely (unfortunately) to only be mildly
trained the AK-47 being simple suits that. Then on top of that all
other kinds of weapons, from heavy machine guns to sniper rifles and
anti aircraft or even anti-satalite rockets and so on (for example
manufactured in larger cities with sufficient man power and stuff for
it).

Mere common sense, isn't it.

*

Don't like war ? Then how about nationalizing finance and democratizing
the businesses now ? All we have to do is understand the (subtle) truth,
organize some political parties in full daylight and march to victory
with nothing more then a pen in our hands (that scheme is already worked
out to a full set of details http://www.socialism.nl/party ), and there
are still 2 more schemes that lead to victory.

All these schemes are to be done concurrently if military mobilization
has to take place, but if we can win without military mobilization then only
the peaceful 4 schemes, right ? If we can and will win that way why even
bother with the guns. That time is still now, it may be a good time to
write a military strategy, but there is still time to just win through
100% peaceful means (scheme 1 'buy/sell fair trade,' 
                     scheme 2 'set up and fund demorcatic businesses'
                     http://www.socialism.nl/fund
                     scheme 3 'set up political parties to win the vote'
                     http://www.socialism.nl/party
                     scheme 4 'construct new government within the old'
                     http://www.socialism.nl/sheet4.txt )
These are all peaceful. Then there is now a scheme 5 which is military.
Doing a scheme 5 is the highest level of force (you'll note these
schemes increase in force). Naturally when you are using a higher level
of force, you are already using the lower levels too, but if you use
the mild force you are not using the higher force yet. Hence a military
mobilization implies all the other schemes to be active, at least I'd
warmly recommend that, right ?

I said often enough I won't rule this, so I won't bother saying that
again, right ? It is merely objective planning and strategy, comments
and corrections much appreciated.
-- 
http://www.socialism.nl