This file lists minor issues/corrections
----------------------------------------

The below issues may not be of any relevance, however honesty may commmand to
list the corrections/updates.

  1.

  Water use (Mon Jan 23 15:10:55 UTC 2012)

  In the book 'Constitution Proposal' is said in the chapter 'Nature is
  treasure,' than one could (sorry for the topic but alas) shower/clean
  oneself with only 3.5 liter. That is possible, undersigned did that;
  but honestly command me to say that I use more water now, however
  without using soap. Soap (and like products) are (mostly) used to
  reduce the amount of scrubbing necessary; and conversely with more
  scrubbing the soap becomes unnecessary. This results in more water,
  but water that is effectively not polluted itself.

  Update: vr feb 24 11:55:47 UTC 2012, I saw my metered water use jump
  from 12 m^3 to 15 m^3 to 18 m^3 from 2009 to 2011 per year; and so
  decided to reduce it again going to use 3.5 liter on showering stuff
  anyway even without soap which is easily possible, and to keep my word.
  (Sorry to babble about this personal things, told you this wasn't 
  important, but I have to say the truth.) 3.5 liter seems unnecessarily
  little so I'm not suggesting even people do that even if I might do that.
  A little care for nature and less pollution would be nice though, and
  it may take some sacrifices within reason, which is the point. The
  waste of western society is at insane levels, imho, it has to be reduced.

  
  2.

  Second version 'Constitution Proposal' should ...

  In a second version of this book (which so far has sold 0 copies),
  besides correcting spelling mistakes, it would (obviously) be good
  to use the Constitution with the latest updates (which is only a few
  changes). The chapter about Einstein could be dumped (because it is
  another subject, but it is in there because this book was also about
  trying to back up the content - which has succeeded to a degree).
  Instead the book 'Revolution & Reform - Manual & Law' could be put
  in its place. Undersigned has no plans at the moment to make these
  changes. With zero copies sold so far it does not seem useful, it
  would be costly (the publisher has mentioned it would be regarded as
  a new book); and it is better to have someone proof read it before
  making a new & better combined book. That book could have the name
  of the latter book as a subtitle. On the other hand there is nothing
  wrong with a short & sweet field manual for the revolution. If there
  comes about some interest in these issues and proposals, at that time
  it could be done. Note that everyone can do this on their own, there
  is no need for any consent from me or any publisher claims - there are
  no such claims, please engage and have fun, free for the cause.


  3.

  ...

  ...